On 2012-05-02 07:02, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
A mention of RFC 3197, and an explicit answer to the questions it
raises, seems necessary to me.

Will be added in the next revision.

It will be along the lines of "what we're doing is much more simple and focused". This MIB is about simple read-only counters of which many servers already provide at least a subset, and for which home-grown bindings into SNMP agents (using Perl scripts and such) already exist in various forms. So to some extent we're standardizing existing practice, which wasn't the case for RFCs 1611 and 1612. And there are already plans and preliminary code for such a DNS MIB in Bind 10.

Simon
--
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to