Andrew, > In the archives since the meeting, I observe some comments at > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg09783.html. But > I do not observe the announcement of a WGLC. I am wondering when we > might expect that call.
both chairs have taken advantage of the season at least a bit. One of the chairs has recused himself being a co-editor, so this is the document shepherd. Issuing the WGLC involves reviewing the draft as well as the recent discussion to generate framing questions. In this particular case, several members of the WG, some of which I remember having been in favour of WGLC during the Vancouver meeting, had expressed support for a major change to the draft suggested by Matthijs Mekking on July 24 <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg09767.html> That would basically mean folding significant parts of 'keytiming bis' into the current 'key timing' draft. My current reading of the sense of the WG is that we move to WGLC with -03, declaring the July 24 suggestion out of scope for this document and keep momentum for 'dnssec bis'. Unless I hear objections, I'll issue a WGLC no later than Thursday this week. Opinions, please. -Peter PS: That said, documents can be reviewed any time by anyone, with or without last call inprogress. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
