-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08-10-12 22:34, Tony Finch wrote: > On 8 Oct 2012, at 16:08, SM <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Does this affect draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis (currently in the >> RFC Editor queue)? > > It's section on change-of-operator was added in revision -03 dated > July 2010. Sadly it is buggy. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-03#section-4.3.5
I > discovered the issue after a DNSSEC workshop by NLNetLabs for SIDN in 2008, and published about it's remedy internally and on mailinglists and tried to get a chapter about it in 4641bis. The first public presentation was made By Olafur in Amsterdam during the OARC workshop: https://www.dns-oarc.net/files/workshop-200905/gudmundsson.pdf to get consencus. So enough prior art. Question is more if we need action and if so what. I don't have any knowledge about the US patent system, or any patent system as a matter of fact. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 F: +31 26 3525505 M: +31 6 23368970 mailto:[email protected] xmpp:[email protected] http://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQdD8JAAoJEDqHrM883AgnCEkH/3m9E1173xk+17nXQa8fVuDE tEe77peJH5nDWiH2fmacX4ogbUWjq1B7j3EXojydZDxjf//ESL99f7Yuc25tCtCX iMo7ldL5cuxOrW88ncnf0/VfhDb+xTUGDI4Wad9fO8g4Hbk/SG5ZJD+jH/Sa+U5E BLOeGSyQG5AIkqJy+tuC+2tXIZqDjSXcFAGRcpnWmHKdcRS+xYCQZPzHgiMeSQvX tyCCRRc77v/IVkFvDjlnJBHE7YULzSgwSVCjHVTGS5grGGMjVMsajIVAAhKImb86 m/IHWHfo+l31YlAyDFdRYrA3GNT0b7MUQae3Evu64vMRVdaVCI74AKk8gHk8/JU= =WzFn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
