-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23-10-12 16:00, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
> While I think the idea of passing keys though the registry between > operator has some merit I do not see it as viable alternative > outside few cc'tld's thus it it does not deserve to be included in > a BCP without full debate. I gave 4 reasons, not one. Running code and current practice being important ones for the IETF. But most of all, I fail to see the motivation for the current advice in the document. If there is no motivation but just an opinion, I think the advice should be deleted from the document. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 F: +31 26 3525505 M: +31 6 23368970 mailto:[email protected] xmpp:[email protected] http://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQhqwYAAoJEDqHrM883AgnEcMIAI0wvqBbWwHiC5G6pJ2PjyOd ejdQ2F/VeA2AqE6IAsQ7nkhTgaeKwg5JNEMQXFNagZgwPLxKT8XAuFW7+WsbTivy zEqNbgNV/sDSPLjmW3qJ7Lh4PZArOsgrv5I/bDLOnZI6PPCHBb4j7LnN5pMZMy3R A71P8A/WhPUo+1GK1rpz97kS9gcr+2B1LoLsm1dSnrJn4sFk8s+zHa6b4KhjpgWE NtStUf7D44ffBcZUrdhK63KqQ4RY1sLxSXMyFZMU3WOVBJ+SnUTCLIe+GVM1d0T9 /zeBl0G3ohuVAWKj3IG3bSlUfzN6rdMi9sW82dGx+Grb9g1VUMr1ywSN5d16eMw= =2P9F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
