In message <[email protected]>, "Lee Howard" writes: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Ted Lemon > > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:46 AM > > To: Warren Kumari > > Cc: Lee Howard; <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] summary (was: RE: new version of IPv6 rDNS for ISPs) > > > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You mean like DynDNS for example? > > > > Exactly. And DynDNS is a great example of why we need a standard. > > Can you list the functional requirements? > > Lee
We have a standard for dynamic DNS updating. And standards for securing it. There are even products from different companies that interoperate. http://dyn.com/support/bonjour-and-dns-discovery/ Now while that page has a SRV record _dns-update._udp in the zone to find the server to send the update to the Mac will send the request to the nameservers for the zone if it is not there. Bog standard named has supported this since before the TSIG RFC was finalised in 2000. And if the client doesn't do it the DHCP server can. It would not suprise me to find someone running our DHCPv6 server updating a zone hosted by dyn.com using UPDATE+TSIG. Thats three vendors all interoperating with UPDATE+TSIG. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
