On Feb 17, 2013, at 10:22 AM, "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]> wrote: > 1 – Is this worth consideration as a WG I-D or should it continue only as an > individual I-D?
Yes, wg i-d. > 2 – If the answer to #1 is that it should be a WG I-D, would you like a brief > discussion of the open issues at IETF 86? No preference, since I have a conflicting session... :} _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
