Tim and all, On 1/08/13 9:21 PM, "Tim Wicinski" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Jay > >I agree it's just "formats" and therefore it's just 'a simple bit of >code', Code is always changeable so long at there is solid motivation to do so. >I tend to find the XML specifications get a bit heavy, and what I >liked in Stephane's draft is that it has a very lightweight feel to it. Yes, XML can sometimes be a heavy solution, but also has a set of positives. It really depends on the implementation in which it is being used. Classic "it depends" response - sorry! ;) > >(I will mention that the IESG is looking for reviewers for >draft-manderson-rdns-xml-01 in case anyone feels extra motivated to >assist in this). Love to iterate this, draft-manderson-rdns-xml-01 was submitted via the rfc-ise as it really is a specific item targeted at a provisioning portion of the DNS hierarchy that has been in production for a number of years. The draft is more to allow the transparency of ICANN operations in such areas that makes sense with the hope that it can provide information to other folk looking to implement similar systems, or spark the thought processes in others that might come up with viable improvements. Cheers Terry
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
