The draft does not really demonstrate what it purports to demonstrate. Or
rather, it mis-casts the problems that have been asserted for dotless
domains. It purports to contradict concerns about:
"...the problems that the DNS is likely to experience with top-level
domains..."
I'm not aware of any language in this draft that makes such an assertion,
and section 4 says:
This document lists the known dotless domains; it does not express an
opinion whether or not there are security considerations with the
existence of dotless domains. The referenced IAB and SSAC reports
discuss the opinions of the respective bodies on the security and
stability considerations of dotless domains.
Could you identify the specific lines or sentences you're concerned about?
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
