On 5 Oct 2013, at 19:55, Warren Kumari wrote:

> So, would like to get some feedback on this version -- I understand that it 
> might not please everyone, such is the nature of compromise.
> 
> W
> 
> Filename:      draft-kumari-ogud-dnsop-cds
> Revision:      05

Section 2.2.1

"The proposal
   below can operate with both models, but the child needs to be aware
   of the parental policies."
also
Section 6.2.1
"The
   DNS Parent needs to publish guidelines for the children as to what
   digest algorithms are acceptable in the CDS record."

Maybe I'm missed it... but how would a child be aware of the "parental 
policies"?       
Billy                           

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to