On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since dnsext is no longer, Paul has contacted me about having some time to >> discuss these during the meeting in Vancouver. I felt this was an excellent >> idea since the many of the comments are from same folks involved in DNSOP. >> I understand that this may not be the 'proper' place for this discussion, >> but I'm willing to move forward unless the AD or the WG direct me otherwise. > > You could reasonably bring them up in intarea. I don't get the impression > from what you are saying that they are ops documents, so they probably don't > belong in dnsop. I don't think there's any likelyhood of them being acepted here. cross-area socialization if appropiate is not a problem imho.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
