On Dec 7, 2013, at 5:03 PM, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 2013-12-07, at 11:33, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Alas, this document is definitely not ready for publication as an RFC. It 
>> still is very unclear which parts are restatements of RFC 6304, which are 
>> changes, and which are speculative. Appendix B makes an attempt to make this 
>> clearer, but fails spectacularly by saying that Appendix B should be removed 
>> from the final document.
> 
> I agree that it's not quite ready for last call, as it stands right now. I 
> was slightly surprised to see the wg last call start, given that (as 
> mentioned in Vancouver, and in the text you quoted) there was an open 
> question about a successor to 6304.

Yup, this is my fault — I *completely* spaced on the discussions in Vancouver 
(sadly much of the meeting is a blur).
I did take a quick look through the minutes before asking for WGLC, but they 
didn’t jog my memory sufficiently. Sorry!

> 
>> I propose that this document be scrapped completely, and that the RFC 6304 
>> successor simply be published with these changes. That new document should 
>> have what is Appendix B of this document as a sub-section of its 
>> introduction (because the changes are significant), and should retain 
>> Appendix A of this document (because it shows due diligence for the changes).
> 
> I could see that working. I could also see this document proceeding, 
> documenting the change in approach, and a separate document being written to 
> update 6304. It would be good to hear the wider working group's opinion on 
> the preferred direction.

Yes please. 

Abashedly,
W

> 
> 
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

--
After you'd known Christine for any length of time, you found yourself fighting 
a desire to look into her ear to see if you could spot daylight coming the 
other way.

    -- (Terry Pratchett, Maskerade)




_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to