On 2013-12-07, at 21:09, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > It appears we now have multiple registries listing the same information. > Specifically: > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/locally-served-dns-zones/locally-served-dns-zones.xhtml > > seems to be a subset of > > http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-use-domain-names/special-use-domain-names.xhtml
Yes, I raised this when the second of the two registries you cited were created, but my concerns were apparently not universally-held as important. > Options to deal with this: > 1. revise the IANA considerations section to indicate that both registries > need to be updated > 2. remove the locally served zones from the special-use-domain-names registry > 3. merge the two registries into a single uber-wonky-name registry > 4. give up on this DNS thing as it was clearly a mistake and go back to ip > address literals I would prefer the pragmatic option 5: 5. Leave both registries as-is, publish Mark's document as-is, and work on a separate registry clean-up draft later, since I am guessing that work will not be uncontentious and the guidance provided by the draft at hand is sufficiently useful not to stall. Joe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
