Its a scaling question. Please don't sidetrack into distaste, its the question of preventing progress by saying "too many" when in fact, its tractable, and its software.
.onion is an eminently tractable problem. Arguing otherwise is to argue the current .onion codebase dependency cannot move, therefore any future CVE against TOR cannot be fixed, therefore further code development on TOR is fruitless, therefore lets all stop coding. Breathing even. This IETF mantra of "too many to change" is wrong. We need to stop invoking the dead weight of the past over future events.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
