- I like better that approach than the previous draft registering many tlds. - I would prefer an IANA registry under .alt with "expert" review policy. A namespace with possible collisions (past or future) have very low value to me. names are leaking in various contexts, so collisions would be bad for the protocols and deployment using that .alt tld.
Marc. Le 2014-02-10 à 15:58, [email protected] a écrit : > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain > Authors : Warren Kumari > Andrew Sullivan > Filename : draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 2014-02-10 > > Abstract: > This document reserves a string to be used as a TLD label in non-DNS > contexts. [Ed note: By now you should be wildly confused. Go read > the intro / background :-P ] > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
