In message <[email protected]>, Paul Wouters wri tes: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > I also think we should establish requirements for updating parent > > zones. As a wg we have jumped in the deep end and gone straight > > to solutions without working out the actual requirements. > > We tried before and failed > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wouters-dnsop-secure-update-use-cases-00 > > then people got tired of waiting for the problem statement to mature, > and worked on solutions instead. > > Paul
Which is no reason to not to try to get a list of requirements out of it now. draft-wouters-dnsop-secure-update-use-cases provides useful background to evaluate the requirements listed in draft-andrews-dnsop-update-parent-zones. Are they complete? We need to look at what goes over the wire. Does it support all the use cases? We need to look at whether there are places to put the policy knobs. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
