Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, "William F. > Maton Sotomayor" writes: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Tony Finch wrote: > > > > > Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Reactions and reviews of the two documents would be most welcome! > > > > > > The as112-dname draft still does not mention the glibc DNAME logging bug. > > > > Which Linux distro, or a set of Linux distros? Some seaches yield various > > bug reports related to DNAME over the last few years in a couple of > > distros. > > Really does it matter? The answer gets correctly processed and a > little syslog noise is produced. If you have the problem upgrade > / report it.
Whether it matters depends on the quantity of reverse DNS lookups you are doing and the completeness of your locally-served zone setup, so I think it is worth including the warning. And I think wfms's question is worth answering but I don't have time to dig through historical versions right now, sorry. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Rockall, Malin: Cyclonic 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8 at first in Rockall, decreasing 3 or 4 except in north Rockall. Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough. Rain or showers. Moderate or good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
