On 2/21/14, 12:29 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Tim Wicinski wrote:
3) New Business
3.1) Privacy and Confidentiality of DNS.
b) Solution Space (10 min)
draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig
draft-wijngaards-dnsop-confidentialdns
draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-privacy-sol
4) Non Actionable DNS Extensions
(The Andrew Sullivan Memorial)
4.1) TLS over DNS, Zi, (10 min)
draft-hzhwm-start-tls-for-dns
Why is TLS for DNS (not 'TLS over DNS') not listed at 3.1?
Paul
Paul
While it definitely has privacy implications, it's also involves the
dreaded 'protocol changes', which chases it into a grey area that while
I'm very willing to dabble in, leaves some purists with a bad taste in
their mouth.
Personally, I think its an inspired idea, especially when you look at
all the tcpm and httpbis work on speeding up connections. I'm willing
to push this forward as well, though I started it there to at least not
forget it.
tim
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
