Joe, On Feb 26, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Feb 25, 2014, at 9:51 AM, Stuart Cheshire <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> If we have *some* pseudo-TLDs reserved for local-use names, > I still don’t see why we need a TLD, or a delegation/reservation under ARPA.
Because if something isn't documented, people tend to squat. > There are many, many TLDs under which an application/protocol implementer can > reserve some namespace for their exclusive use at low cost ($10/year, say). > Why is this approach not preferred for a new application/protocol? It seems > far simpler. Why does RFC 1918 address space exist? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
