L. Aaron Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since I am the only user of the sensor_id field right now, I'd say we remove > the > text: > "The sensor_id is an opaque byte string as defined by RFC 5001 in > section 2.3 [RFC5001]. The sensor_id MUST be escaped as defined in > section 2.6 of RFC4627 [RFC4627]." > and just leave: > "This field returns the sensor information where the record was seen. > This field is represented as a JSON [RFC4627] string." > > Would that be OK for you?
I think that makes sense because I can't see any reason to put non-UTF-8 junk in that field. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Humber: Southwest, backing east, 4. Slight, occasionally moderate. Showers. Good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
