On Mar 3, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote: > are you advising (by implication) that a receiver who hears TC=1 with > ANCOUNT>0 or NSCOUNT>0 or ADCOUNT>0 treat it as a FORMERR?
Hmm. I always assumed that if TC=1, pretty much everything else in the response was irrelevant since I would be unable to trust what was there was complete. So I'd say 'no' and I don't see any ambiguity.... Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
