On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Christopher Morrow <[email protected]>
wrote:
> If I have a patch which makes no sense, will you also add it?
>
>
Speaking for Paul,
Paul used value judgement based on the persons reputation.
If Mark thought it was important enough to submit a patch then there must be a
reason, even if
Paul was not clueful enough to understand in the few minutes he thought about
it.
Olafur
> On Mar 22, 2014 1:25 PM, "Paul Vixie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> bert hubert wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > 43.504115 IP x.y.117.10.0 > 192.175.48.6.53: 6365+ SOA?
> > 168.192.in-addr.arpa. (38)
> > 45.504152 IP x.y.117.10.0 > 192.175.48.6.53: 6365+ SOA?
> > 168.192.in-addr.arpa. (38)
> > 49.505124 IP x.y.117.10.0 > 192.175.48.6.53: 6365+ SOA?
> > 168.192.in-addr.arpa. (38)
> >
> > PowerDNS now refuses to attempt to answer such packets, which silences the
> > error messages.
>
> mark andrews sent me a similar patch to bind 4.9 back in 1992, which
> made no sense to me but i put it in anyway. thanks for explaining.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
