On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4/14/14, 8:50 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote: >> >> On 14 apr 2014, at 14:32, Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> op 12-04-14 09:28, Patrik Fältström schreef: >>>> >>>> No, I want B. That CDS and CDNSKEY is staying in the zone. >>> >>> To keep it in the same thread, >>> I want: >>> >>> C: The child MAY remove the CDS/CDNSKEY RR from the zone once the >>> parent has published it, and this is how to do that safely. >>> >>> So I'm ok if they stay in, but we need a way to get them out for the >>> ones that need that. >> >> I am fine with C. >> >> paf >> > > Actually C helps me with some of the wording, as I spent some time > yesterday with a red pen going over editorial issues.
Hopefully you are reviewing the latest (-05) :-) Actually, I'm planning on incorporating C - chairs, please let me know if this does not align with your view of consensus. W > > tim > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
