On Apr 23, 2014, at 11:11 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:16:29AM -0700, > Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 39 lines which said: > >> Sure. What were the results of your testing? > > I quickly tested with .FR authoritative name servers and both NSD and > BIND seem to silently ignore the incoming request. No response is seen > coming back. > > 08:08:44.460710 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 8611, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto UDP (17), length 192) > 192.168.1.10.48864 > 194.0.9.1.53: [udp sum ok] 5886 zoneRef*-| > [0q] 0/0/0 (164) > 08:08:45.459519 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 8612, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto UDP (17), length 192) > 192.168.1.10.48864 > 194.0.9.1.53: [udp sum ok] 5886 zoneRef*-| > [0q] 0/0/256 ar: > > ^A^@^@M-^K^@^@^@^@^@^@^@M-^KM-~M-^?SXM-*l^P^^^TM-"n4^gs^OM-ylMM-S0M-9M-=M-^F_^D^V4^NM-us{^^:^@^@^@XM-@^TM-@^JM-@"M-@!^@9^@8^@M-^H^@M-^GM-@^OM-@^E^@5^@M-^DM-@^RM-@^HM-@^\M-@^[^@^V^@^SM-@^MM-@^C^@^JM-@^SM-@^IM-@^_M-@^^^@3^@2^@M-^Z^@M-^Y^@E^@DM-@^NM-@^D^@/^@M-^V^@A^@^U^@^R^@^I^@^T^@^Q^@^H^@^F^@M-^?^A^@^@^I^@#^@^@^@^O^@^A^A.[|domain] > 08:08:47.459513 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 8613, offset 0, flags [DF], > proto UDP (17), length 192) > 192.168.1.10.48864 > 194.0.9.1.53: [udp sum ok] 5886 zoneRef*-| > [0q] 0/0/512 ar: > > ^A^@^@M-^K^@^@^@^@^@^@^@M-^KM-~M-^?SXM-*l^P^^^TM-"n4^gs^OM-ylMM-S0M-9M-=M-^F_^D^V4^NM-us{^^:^@^@^@XM-@^TM-@^JM-@"M-@!^@9^@8^@M-^H^@M-^GM-@^OM-@^E^@5^@M-^DM-@^RM-@^HM-@^\M-@^[^@^V^@^SM-@^MM-@^C^@^JM-@^SM-@^IM-@^_M-@^^^@3^@2^@M-^Z^@M-^Y^@E^@DM-@^NM-@^D^@/^@M-^V^@A^@^U^@^R^@^I^@^T^@^Q^@^H^@^F^@M-^?^A^@^@^I^@#^@^@^@^O^@^A^A.[|domain] Thanks, this is the kind of data I was looking for. The draft seems to assume that the server will give an error, not no response. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
