On May 7, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:
> First, I'm a little uncomfortable with "optimized reply" as the name > for this. It seems to me that one could be getting this special I share this concern. If the mindset of "optimization" propagates into documentation and such, then every recursive operator out there will want to turn this on because, after all, who doesn't want their replies to be optimized? DW
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
