On 20 maj 2014, at 14:17, Petr Spacek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, would it be too weird to use > > _http._srv.[name] CNAME _https._tcp.[name] > > as 'HTTPS required' signalization? > > (This is weird, I admit that. There will be troubles with DNS client > libraries not exposing CNAMEs etc... I just can't resist.)
_http._srv.[name] URI "https:[name]" ;-) Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
