Ben Laurie wrote:
> Surely the problem is that the server must continue to support clients
> that don't look for SRV. So, what's the incentive for a server to
> start using it?
Port based virtual (without port numbers in URLs) hosting.
With the following extended reverse look up:
1.0.132.32.112.131.in-addr.arpa. PTR a.example.com
2.0.132.32.112.131.in-addr.arpa. PTR b.example.com
it is better than name based ones.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
