On May 28, 2014, at 9:25 AM, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote: > Is the use case perhaps the ability to attack comment-like metadata
Definitely a possibility. :) > If this is really something that's mainly useful for BIND9, then you'd think > a private RRType would suffice, similar to the use of TYPE65534 in BIND9's > auto-dnssec maintain. Yup, that's what I'm getting at. Reasonable thing to document through the ISE, of course. I think this work is out of scope for DNSOP, and that it's not sufficiently needed to justify firing up a working group to do it, nor change the DNSOP charter to make it in scope. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
