Hi, Yes, I noted the hand waving as well as a few hand-passes of problems to $elsewhere.
I personally think this needs (much) more thinking, before coming to the front of the room in DNSOP - are you considering a bar session somewhere in Toronto to chat through this? Cheers Terry On 24/06/2014 7:32 am, "Paul Hoffman" <[email protected]> wrote: >Just to be clear: Warren asked for feedback with an open mind. If you >read the draft, you'll see Warren and I explicitly handwave. Also, note >that at the moment, he and I disagree about some of the suggestions, just >like it seems that some people here so far do. FWIW, I currently prefer >the result to be a more robust cache (something that acts just like a >cache but also knows how to synthesize NXDOMAIN for things not in the >root), and Warren prefers the result to be a less robust slave (something >that does not have as close of a relationship with the master as what we >normally think, but gives authoritative answers). > >That's fine: it is supposed to be a consensus document and we aren't >there yet. My hope is that DNSOP doesn't become too DNSEXT-like where if >the -00 for a proposal isn't universally loved, it is destroyed instead >of worked on. > >--Paul Hoffman >_______________________________________________ >DNSOP mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
