On Jul 8, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> this document seems “bind” specific that it assumes that the recursive
>> resolver can be both authoritative and recursive which is not a
>> requirement.
>
> You can't implement this draft's validation and fallback requirements just
> by configuring BIND, so I think all name server software will need
> significant improvements.
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/
> FitzRoy: Northerly 4 or 5, increasing 6 or 7 in south, perhaps gale 8 later in
> southeast. Moderate, becoming moderate or rough in south. Fair. Good.
I agree with you that just configuring “Some off the shelf name server” is not
enough but
wether that should be built into Authoritative server or is a stand-alone tool
should be left
each implementation.
Olafur
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
