On 8/8/14 8:16 AM, The IESG wrote:
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
> (dnsop) to consider the following document:
> - 'Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS'
>   <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [email protected] mailing lists by 2014-08-22. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

FYI,

I requested that this last call be rerun due to US incorrectly assigning
the status of informational and therefore a 2 week duration on the original.

The importance of feedback is underscored by it's intended standards
track status.

Thank you
Joel

> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This document specifies how a child zone in the DNS can publish a
>    record to indicate to a parental agent that it may copy and process
>    certain records from the child zone.  The existence of and value
>    change of the record may be monitored by a parental agent and acted
>    on as appropriate.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to