Hi, During Intarea session as far as I can remember (probably others can also remember this.. the one who attended my presentation in last IETF), Suzanne raised this question that why a draft related to DNSOP is in intarea.
Maybe now it is a good timing to raise this question that whether or not DNSOP WG wants to accept to work on this draft or whether wants to leave it to intarea. If it supposed to discuss in DNSOP then it needs to be in the list of working items in the links of documents. Please share your opinions. In both mailinglist, there are some discussions regarding this draft and I tried to keep the discussion on both mailinglists. A short history of this draft. This draft was related to DNSEXT and active since IETF 85. It supposed to address the last miles of internet and focuses on secure authentication and automation of this process. During this time, several people reviewed this draft (most reviewed was offlist ) and a few was on the mailinglist. http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig/ Thanks, Best, Hosnieh > -----Original Message----- > From: DNSOP [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:27 PM > To: dnsop > Subject: [DNSOP] The DNSOP document list; request for reviewers > > Greetings. Wearing my spiffy new WG Secretary hat (which looks completely > different from Suzanne's and Tim's hats!), I'd like folks to review the WG > document list at: > > http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html > > I have a specific request that will hope the WG chairs: Let me know if you're > willing to review a document that has few or no one in the "Reviewers" > column. This kind of commits you to read the current draft, to at least read the > diffs of the draft as it progresses, and to do a complete read again during WG > Last Call. This information helps the WG chairs know what drafts should and > should not be part of the WG charter. > > If you want to discuss any particular draft in the WG, don't respond to this > message, of course. Start a new thread, hopefully with the draft name in it. I'll > try to track the level of discussion based on those threads. > > Feel free to let me know if you have any secretary-ish questions. Any chair-ish > questions ("when will you move Draft X forwards", "when will the WG LC on > Draft Y be over", "can I present Draft X at the next IETF meeting", ...) go to the > chairs or to the list. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
