> for a 12-octet overhead. Maybe a reference to RFC 1035 section 3.2.1 is > needed to clarify? (although this 12-octet minimum overhead is rather > "well known")
I guess yes. Because in your text it appears that you only considered that combination but actually you meant the whole message and it was a bit confusing. Best, Hosnieh _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
