At Mon, 22 Sep 2014 20:06:06 -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > I did a clean read, and it feels *much* better than the early drafts. I have > a small number of editorial comments, but some bigger questions as well. I > strongly suspect the questions can be answered by small additions to the > draft. > > At the beginning of 2.1: > For ZSKs, the issue for the zone operator/signer is to ensure that > any caching validator has access to a particular signature that > corresponds to a valid ZSK. > "that corresponds to" seem wrong here. The following may be more accurate (or > it might be wrong...): > For ZSKs, the issue for the zone operator/signer is to ensure that > any caching validator has access to a particular signature has > access to the corresponding valid ZSK.
I can't parse the last sentence above and would appreciate clarification. The noun clause which is apparently intended as the object of the infinitive "to ensure" contains two finite verbs. Perhaps a sub-ordinating conjunction has been omitted? Best regards, Niall O'Reilly _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
