there's a cart/horse proble in this thread.

right now we're arguing whether to adopt it.

if we adopt it then its goods and bads will become relevant.

that said:

> Bob Harold <mailto:[email protected]>
> Monday, October 20, 2014 2:03 PM
>
> I support the idea of qname minimization, but I think there is a
> common case where it will cause additional DNS round trips, slowing
> the response and increasing the number of packets and queries the
> servers must handle.
>

i argue that caching will equalize these logic paths over a very short
stretch of wall time.

-- 
Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to