> Stephane Bortzmeyer <mailto:[email protected]>
> Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:24 AM
> [Copy to dnsop since the qname minimisation draft is now a WG item at
> dnsop.]
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:21:57AM -0700,
> David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote
>
> http://www.google.com/patents/EP2611116A1?cl=en

importantly, google's policy is to use patents only in defense. i've
requested that they make that explicit in the case of this particular
patent, but, that's a small detail. i believe that query minimization
should proceed as though this patent did not exist, for the good of the
internet economy. (if it fails to reach consensus that's a different
matter, but, let it not be because of this patent.)

-- 
Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to