On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 25, 2014, at 6:43 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> We want humans in the loop, I would love to see a twitter feed when ever >> Comcast does a Negative Trust Anchor. > > Like https://twitter.com/ComcastDNS, for example? Either things haven't been > failing much lately, or they're not updating it as often as we had hoped. >
Or both... I suspect it might also be: Installing a NTA is annoying. It requires poking at running servers, you may have to talk to lawyers (shudder), you may have to get PR people in the loop, etc. This means that they only get put in for actual issues that affect a large number of users. If maryandjohnsvacation.photo goes bogus (because Mary typo'ed the entry in her crontab) it is highly unlikely that you will get DNS operators to go through the rigmarole of installing an NTA. W > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
