> Tony Finch <mailto:[email protected]>
> Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:13 AM
> Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> With normal DNSSEC validation, resolvers have a way to recover from data
>>> corruption. With this local root zone proposal they do not.
>> i seem to have missed a step. why?
>
> If a validating resolver gets a bogus answer it will retry the query on
> another server. With a local root zone you are disabling this fallback.

that's either an argument for listing multiple servers, the first being
on the loopback, the other(s) being real global root name servers; or,
instead of telling bind9 "forward only", tell it "forward first".

the other thread on this draft reached a similar end when considering
what happens when the zone times out. these are just different forms of
data-unavailablility, which can *always* be forced.

-- 
Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to