On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 05:46:46PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote a message of 18 lines which said:
> I do not ask immediately a slot for > draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation Well, I changed my mind, I would like a slot to discuss two issues: * it has been said <http://blogs.verisigninc.com/blog/entry/minimum_disclosure_what_information_does> that qname minimisation minimises the amount of data sent. That's of course the goal. Privacy, like every security feature, is always a compromise. The negative consequences are today presented at the beginning of section 3 of the draft. Is this mention sufficient or should we add something? * two algorithms are sketched in the current draft but only the aggressive one is really detailed. The lazy one seems under-specified. Should we keep two algorithms (plus other possible optimisations like treating the root and the TLDs in a special way) or should we simplify? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
