Andras Salamon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Robert Edmonds pointed out that using NULL is not a perfect solution > here. On the other hand, I am not convinced that creating a completely > new record type is better than NULL for achieving interoperability > with broken implementations. These solutions are both likely to lead > to problems.
What problems do you anticipate? It seems benign in my limited testing so far (though I have only tried two high-quality resolver implementations). Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Southeast Iceland: Variable 3 at first in northwest, otherwise cyclonic 4 or 5, increasing 5 to 7, perhaps gale 8 later. Moderate or rough. Occasional rain or snow. Moderate, occasionally very poor later. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
