Tim Wicinski writes:
> The WG has several documents that we need to spend time in Dallas moving
> towards completion. But we also believe the RFC 6761 drafts should not
> be given short shrift.
>
> Accordingly, we are tentatively planning a Virtual Interim Meeting to
> dive a little deeper on the special names drafts, including possible
> architectural implications of the apparent increase in interest in RFC
> 6761, as we attempt to muddle through the questions we’ve seen and the
> ones we anticipate.
>
Following this discussion from a distance, I cannot help wondering
whether this is special names stuff might in violate RFC 2860 section 4.3.
jaap
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
