> On Mar 25, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2015, at 7:42 AM, Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have a minor nit for consideration: the examples should also include IPv6 >> loopback ::1 as well. > > Of what operational value is that? (This is a serious question.)
This is somewhat of a religious thing for me, but: a) vendors respond to behaviors documented in RFCs when RFPs/RFIs are issued b) IP packets are generally assumed to be version 4 by most people, getting in the habit of documenting the behavior of both isn’t really that hard. We need to get into the habit of putting v6 examples in documents, it’s 2015. c) people copy examples forever, having good well-documented examples for both are important. - Jared _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
