tale> At IETF this week it was decided to refocus the effort on the tale> edns-client-subnet draft on only documenting the existing tale> behaviour of deployed implementations.
f4t> That's disappointing and somewhat at odds with the theme of the f4t> on-list discussions since the last draft was posted. Oh well. Dave also replied but a couple of us have "volunteered" to spin a new draft that lists the issues with the existing implementations and design and proposes a new design based on comments and lessons learned from the early implementers. It seemed cleaner to use the current draft to simply document current state of the art and have a new document that works on enhancements. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
