On May 1, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I regret that draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-01 keeps using a wrong
> definition for "RRset", which is contradictory with the definitions
> proposed in this thread for "label":
>
> A set of resource records with the same label, class and type, but
> with different data.
And, two sentences later, it says:
As a clarification, "same label" in this definition means "same owner name".
> While it should be:
>
> A set of resource records with the same owner name (FQDN), class and
> type, but with different data.
We coud do that, and change the attribution to be "(Definition derived from
from {{RFC2181}})", but is that really needed, given the current clarification?
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
