Since I already said I was ok with the addition, can we just stipulate that I'm wrong and move along with it?
A -- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums. > On May 6, 2015, at 17:06, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have never heard of ARPA being treated as a subclass of gTLD. > > Regards, > -drc > >> On May 4, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:45:09AM +0000, Edward Lewis wrote: >>> ccTLD and gTLD, but those are examples. ("into ccTLDs, gTLDs, and other >>> categories;")[0] >> >> I'm not opposed to the "and other categories", but the truth is that >> anyone who cares about DNS never hears about those other categories. >> Even around ICANN policy discussions everything that isn't a ccTLD is >> treated as a subclass of gTLD. >> >> A >> >> -- >> Andrew Sullivan >> [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
