Whilst discussing 5966-bis with my co-authors connection-close with the co-authors, we were reminded of this point I made in draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close in relation to ยง7 of RFC 6891:
" TODO: note - the constraint in RFC 6891 appears unnecessarily strict - it appears to mandate that the EDNS(0) support indication is on a per-request basis, but it would be reasonable on a connection- orientated transport to assume that ANY preceding request on that connection with an OPT RR is sufficient to indicate that the client supports EDNS(0)." Is this something that the WG believes needs to be fixed? Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
