On 18 Jun 2015, at 6:53, Tony Finch wrote: > Patrik Fältström <p...@frobbit.se> wrote: > >> >> The over arching issue here is that there is no right answer regarding >> non ascii in URIs. > > > What about RFC 3987 ?
Not everyone have implemented it, and the consensus when creating the URI RR was that the RR should not be limited to only IRIs. I see an issue with IETF not stating clearly IRI's (i.e. UTF-8 and then %-encoding) are in use is a problem both here and there. And such a statement is what I think is needed for not only the URI RR but also other cases. paf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
