Steve Crocker writes:
> Folks,
>
> I`ve been watching the dialog on this list regarding to level names.
> Attached is my attempt to clarify the state of affairs and identify the
> loose ends. Both PDF and pptx versions attached, the latter in case
> someone is moved to edit the slides directly.
Either I don't understand the slides or they seem to be inconsistent.
As an example, you defines 8 "states" [1] and 8 definitions (later
called "Categories: when you give exanples. However the examples
doesn't match the definitions:
Definition 2: Names that have not been formally recognized but
are being used privately or for applications that have
not yet become standard
Definition 3: Two letter Latin characters that have not yet
been assigned by the ISO 3166 maintenance agency but
might be in the future.
Category 2: xq
Category 3: onion
Are these mistakes or purposely. (There seem to be more of these cases
on the slides).
jaap
[1] I'm not sure whether this is a proper term. Can one state move to another?
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
