Steve Crocker writes:
> >> xq
> >
> > 'pq' is a better example. 'xq' is classified as User Assigned, which
> > means it has been assigned for use by anyone for their own purposes. 'pq'
> > is (using Wikipedia�s term) unassigned.
>
> Thanks. I didn't check the tables before writing. I was pretty sure
> xq wasn't already assigned to a specific country or territory, but I
> didn't think about a '1918' style designation of two letter codes.
> Perhaps we need another subset to put these into. It would be a
> 'final' state in the sense that once a two letter code is put into
> that state, it can't move to another state. And the purview would be
> the ISO 3166-1 Maintenance Agency.
FYI: There has been attempts to move from '1918' style space to allocated
space but in the cases I know, it has been refused. by the ISO 3166/MA.
jaap
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
