How specific is the ordering dependency by resolver code variant? by version?
If this becomes a candidate for typing specific resolvers, its useful knowledge -G On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:17:39PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > are ordered so that in any chain of CNAMEs such as: > > > > A. IN CNAME B. > > B. IN CNAME C. > > ... > > L. IN CNAME M. ; logically *and* positionally last > > > > the last CNAME RR in the response is also the logically last link > > in the portion of the chain returned by the resolver. > > This requirement is also interesting, because it's slightly different: > an ordering of different RRsets _of the same RRTYPE_, not of all the > RRsets. > > Best regards, > > A > -- > Andrew Sullivan > a...@anvilwalrusden.com > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
