On 30 Sep 2015, at 14:48, 神明達哉 wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Suzanne Woolf
<[email protected]> wrote:
This begins the working group last call for
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet, "Client Subnet in DNS
Queries.” The
document has gotten significant feedback and the editors have worked
hard to
document current use of the client-subnet EDNS option.
We’re seeking consensus to advance it to the IESG with an intended
status of
Informational. If you support it, please say so. If you don’t,
please say
why.
I'm not necessarily opposed to advancing it, but I have one high level
question. It would be nicer if it can be clarified before advancing
it: are we expecting newer implementations are developed based on this
specification,
I know of at least one significant implementation based on the current
specification that is proceeding right now. So that's a vague,
unsubstantiated data point for you :-)
There is significant customer demand in the enterprise DNS market for
features that require edns-client-subnet, and a significant resolver
population that supports it today. I think it's unreasonable to expect
either that commercial operators will be willing to publish their
internal product plans to dnsop or that silence from that community
implies that no work is being done.
Hence, I don't think there's any meaningful such clarification that
could be included in the draft (although I understand why you suggested
it).
Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
